The fugitive – Episode one – In the beginning

This man is on the run from British justice. Would you like to guess the crime which he has been accused of? Did he murder a child in its bed? Did he extort money from some little old lady? Did he master mind a bank robbery? No, none of these things. Howard Fredrics is guilty of holding an opinion.
At least that is what British justice has meted out to him this past month. To understand how this all happened we need to go right back to the beginning. What I present here is no more than an abridged version of what has been happening in reference to this case and I recommend that you investigate further by taking a good look at a website called www.sirpeterscott.com while you still can, because it is quite possible that this site may well be removed in the future. For now let us begin at the beginning.

Dr Fredrics is a composer and sound designer, not the type of person one would normally associate with the acts of aggression he has been convicted of. He is well respected within his profession and has had a distinguished career in education in the USA for the past twenty years and more prior to his appointment as Senior Lecturer of Music Technology at Kingston University – London which is where the story starts.


In June 2005 11 members of staff at Kingston University were persuaded to file a collective grievance against Howard Fredrics. It would appear that this grievance was compiled in response to various questions raised by Dr Fredrics about some of the internal verification processes of the University. There was also the question of Dr Fredrics refusal to sign a grievance against another member of staff early in 2003. Howard was unhappy with the way this grievance was solicited and in fact asked questions about the legality of putting a grievance together in this way asking whether or not the University had contravened its own policies in handling the matter in this way.

Howard Fredrics was formally dismissed from his position as Senior Lecturer at Kingston University in 2006. It is not quite clear if the website www.sirpeterscott.com was born before or after Dr Fredrics dismissal. What is clear is that Dr Fredrics and other contributors to the site have not been shy about publishing facts about Kingston University which paint a very ugly picture of malcontent and misadventure. In an attempt in May 2009 to shut down the site Sir George Peter Scott (Professor) the vice chancellor of Kingston University appealed to the WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organisation) on the basis that the name sirpeterscott was protected as a trade mark however the WIPO ruled that his complaint was not upheld and the ownership of the domain name remains with Dr Fredrics. Having spent four thousand pounds of tax payers money on trying to block the website you can understand Sir Peters disappointment at the ruling although the HEFC’s decision that this was an acceptable use of public funding must have softened the blow. However it didn’t stop there, and soon Dr Fredrics was about to received a summons to answer an accusation of harassment.

Workplace Bullying

When we talk about bullying in the workplace people can quite often state those obvious inflagrations such as being shouted at in front of others or having credit for their work stolen by a colleague or boss. Actually I think workplace bullying starts in much more subtle ways.

Top of my list comes the implication that if you have time off work for sick you are 'giving in to it'. A phrase that I have heard more than once from manangers and colleagues alike directed at both myself and others. The idea that the common cold is a piffling little matter and that one should adopt an attitude of stoicism, coming in to work ignoring the cough and the red eyes despite the inevitability that you will pass it on to others is ridiculous. The common cold is a high invasive virus that affects many of the organs in the body, along with th mucous membrane, connective tissue, muscle and bone. You'd be amazed at the number of people who have a heart attack while fighting or whilst recovering from a cold. Just because it is common, doesn't mean it's not dangerous. Yet this attitude is sanctioned by law where a person can be sacked for having more days of sick than is stipulated in their contract of employment. We are no talking big numbers here. People have been sacked for taking more than 8 days of sick in any one year. Ridiculous!

The next on my list is discounting of feelings. You know what I mean. When you tell someone you feel you have been treated unjustly and they say "oh, it's only work, don't let it get to you" or telling you that life is too short to talk about it. Nine times out of ten when people preach to you in this way you can be sure that the reason why they are so keen to discount it, is that it is not happening to them, and possibly never has.

Belittleing. This is done in a very subtle way and is similar to the one above. You are given to understand that you are a bit over emotional. Not handling it in a professional way. This happened to me in my place of work. You have to have it in context to really see the full picture. After a period of intense bullying in my work place culminating in my having a disasterious interview with the most senior member of staff in which I was shouted at and told I had no credibility. (A bullying incident in it's own right) I along with some others was informed by email that if I wanted to continue to carry out the duties of my enhanced post that I needed to reapply. I'd had a rough year so I decided not to bother. One morning I arrived at work and there were just two people in the office. One of which had had quite a meteoric rise up the ranks. She asked me how I was and I replied OK. She asked again because she thought I didn't sound ok. I again replied I'm ok. She asked again was I sure I was ok. This time I said, well what do you expect****. I've been told to reapply for my management job, I have been told I have no credibility, I've let the job go because I am not being supported by management. How do you think I should feel? For this I was summonsed back to the office from 20 miles away later that day to be told by my manager that this form of communication was unacceptable. I was being belittled by the first colleague , and when I stuck up for myself I was bullied by my boss
.
Leaving out. A little trick going on in the workplace these days are buddy groups. Little cliches of people who 'get on really well together' These people will agree to meet up at certain times, slap each other on the back with their hail fellow well met and then go off together to enjoy a chat and a drink. (Networking) naturally what this tends to do is leave behind a smaller number of people who are not in the cliche.

Witholding knowledge. Little things like not telling you a meeting has been cancelled. Or not letting you know that they date for expenses claims has been changed. Not notifying people that resources have come into stock creating a free for all in which case some people get all the resources and some never get any.

These are just some of the experiences that I had and that I saw happening in the workplace that as far as I'm concerned constitute that low level of bullying. Make no mistake though. Companies that use this kind of bullying have always got higher level stuff going on that is even worse.

If you want to access a free course on workplace bullying register on this site.
www.onlinecoachingpartnerships.co.uk